united colours of vruz

  • Ask me Ask me Ask me
  • Submit something interesting
  • 14th June 2011

  • 66 notes 
  • Permalink
  • Tweet this

fbi f.b.i. foia civil rights aclu politics surveillance surveillance state civil liberties patriot act

A LINK

FBI to Expand Domestic Surveillance Powers as Details Emerge of Its Spy Campaign Targeting Activists

DemocracyNow.org

Civil liberties advocates are raising alarm over news the FBI is giving agents more leeway to conduct domestic surveillance. According to the New York Times, new guidelines will allow FBI agents to investigate people and organizations “proactively” without firm evidence for suspecting criminal activity.

We speak to former FBI agent Mike German, who now works at the American Civil Liberties Union, and Texas activist Scott Crow, who has been the focus of intense FBI surveillance from 2001 until at least 2008. Using the Freedom of Information Act, Crow received 440 pages of heavily redacted documents revealing the FBI had set up a video camera outside his house, traced the license plates of cars parked in front of his home, recorded the arrival and departure of his guests, and observed gatherings that Crow attended at bookstores and cafes.

The agency also tracked Crow’s emails and phone conversations and picked through his trash to identify his bank and mortgage companies. “It’s been definitely traumatizing at different points,” says Crow. “But if we don’t come out and be open about this, then they’ve already won, and the surveillance and the ‘war on terror’ wins against us.”

MP3 audio | MP4 video | MP4 torrent | TXT transcript

vruz: “If we don’t get the power of Grayskull we won’t be able to do our job properly. we need to know exactly how many serves of corn flakes these commies had in the morning before they joined that damn street protest”

Hoover would be proud.

  • 23rd April 2011

  • 3 notes 
  • Permalink
  • Tweet this

corporatism google big brother transparency surveillance surveillance state

A LINK

"Who Has Your Back?" In Depth: Corporate Transparency About Government Demands for User Information

by Rainey Reitman, EFF

EFF recently launched a campaign calling on companies to stand with their users when the government comes looking for data. (If you haven’t done so, sign our petition urging companies to provide better transparency and privacy.) This article will provide a more detailed look at one of the four categories in which a company can earn a gold star in our campaign: transparency about government requests.

We’re asking companies to do two things in order earn a gold star in the transparency category: provide reports on how often they provide data to the government, and publish their law enforcement guidelines.

First, EFF is measuring whether companies publish the number of government demands they receive for user data, whether it’s an official demand such as a warrant or an unofficial request. Google led the way in this category, and is the only company in our list currently publishing aTransparency Report. According to the report, over the course of six months Google has received 30 data requests from Israel, 71 data requests from Belgium, 1,343 data requests from the U.K. and 4,287 data requests from the U.S. As Google explains:

We believe that this raw data will give people insight into whether or not our services are accessible in a given country at a given time. Historically, information like this has not been broadly available. We hope this tool will be helpful in studies about service outages and disruptions and that other companies will make similar disclosures.

Google’s report is just a start — they are continuing to investigate providing more detailed information about the requests they receive and we have ideas about how they can do even more, but for their transparency report they received half a gold star.

— read more —

Atonement by Toni Romero Powered by Tumblr / Archives / Feed